Description
This is the assignment that was turned in and the feedback that was given. She wants the changes to be made and resubmitted.
https://mobap.instructure.com/courses/24574/assign…
This was the finished document and below were the comments.
You have a start to your paper, but did not follow the guidelines to focus on the ELA curriculum of one school, consulting both print / online and human resources to get a full picture of the curriculum development / revision process. See enclosed rubric for detailed feedback. If you wish to redo the assignment for up to 50% of lost credit, you may resubmit by T 2/16. Let me know if you wish to do so and if I can guide further. This shows her comments and why she gradedCurriculum development and revision reflection 1CriteriaRatingsPts
Summarizes chosen school’s plan for curriculum development and revision. Includes a description of the demographics of the school and district.
Comments
3 / 10 pts
Includes school’s timeline for revision process.
Comments
8 / 10 pts
Explains the role that faculty and staff members play in the curriculum development and revision process. Includes resource / reference information describing how this information was obtained (person’s name / role for interview, web pages, etc.). Multiple sources used for information, both online / print and human (through email interaction or phone / in person interview).
Comments
5 / 10 pts
Describes the implementation process the school has used or will use to provide ongoing revisions and development to their curriculum.
Comments
3 / 10 pts
Explains how curriculum development is influenced by diverse student populations.
Comments
2 / 5 pts
Appropriate written communication skills, including APA formatted reference list.
Comments
4 / 5 pts
Total Points: 25the way that she did.
