This is the assignment that was turned in and the feedback that was given. She wants the changes to be made and resubmitted.
This was the finished document and below were the comments.
You have a start to your paper, but did not follow the guidelines to focus on the ELA curriculum of one school, consulting both print / online and human resources to get a full picture of the curriculum development / revision process. See enclosed rubric for detailed feedback. If you wish to redo the assignment for up to 50% of lost credit, you may resubmit by T 2/16. Let me know if you wish to do so and if I can guide further. This shows her comments and why she gradedCurriculum development and revision reflection 1CriteriaRatingsPts
Summarizes chosen school’s plan for curriculum development and revision. Includes a description of the demographics of the school and district.
3 / 10 pts
Includes school’s timeline for revision process.
8 / 10 pts
Explains the role that faculty and staff members play in the curriculum development and revision process. Includes resource / reference information describing how this information was obtained (person’s name / role for interview, web pages, etc.). Multiple sources used for information, both online / print and human (through email interaction or phone / in person interview).
5 / 10 pts
Describes the implementation process the school has used or will use to provide ongoing revisions and development to their curriculum.
3 / 10 pts
Explains how curriculum development is influenced by diverse student populations.
2 / 5 pts
Appropriate written communication skills, including APA formatted reference list.
4 / 5 pts
Total Points: 25the way that she did.